
Prior to now yr or so, 3D printer costs have dropped, with many well-liked distributors providing entry-level fashions for properly below $200. AnkerMake’s first printer, the M5, launched final yr, will not be considered one of them. It debuted at greater than triple that worth, and continues to be being offered at $599. That places it firmly within the superior consumer market. However AnkerMake, which is a newcomer to 3D printers, appears eager to affix the price-dropping pattern with the M5C. It is a related printer to the M5, but it surely trades a couple of of the latter’s higher-end options for a significantly diminished worth of $399, whereas nonetheless providing sufficient performance and worth to make it a compelling midrange 3D printer.
The Design: Print With Your Selection of Filaments
Regardless of its smaller worth, the M5C is bodily giant, weighing about 24 kilos, so it would be best to place it someplace the place you don’t want to maneuver it steadily. Whereas not fairly out-of-the-box prepared just like the Flashforge Adventurer collection, the M5C continues to be straightforward to assemble. It’s a gantry-style printer, with enclosed drive screws offering the Z axis (up and down) motion to the direct-drive extruder head. The Y axis is offered by the ahead and backward motion of the print mattress, whereas the X axis (side-to-side) is a results of the extruder, or scorching finish, transferring left and proper.
The 9.25-by-9.2-inch print mattress is heated, too, which mixed with the 300-degree-C-maximum extruder, lets you print utilizing all kinds of filaments together with PLA, PLA+, PETG, ABS, TPU, carbon fiber, and wooden. The print mattress contains a detachable plate fabricated from versatile PEI thermoplastic, which bends to assist take away cussed prints. In my testing, I by no means had a print that refused to launch, although there have been a couple of instances the place the versatile print mattress proved its value.
Assembling the printer is simple, and took lower than quarter-hour, partly as a result of I had a trick up my sleeve. Not like the documentation that got here with the M5 that I examined, the M5C’s directions don’t counsel utilizing the packing foam to help the gantry when assembling the printer, which was a helpful tip and one I used once more for the M5C meeting. You will want to connect the gantry to the bottom with eight Allen-head screws, plug in a couple of cables, then connect the filament holder on the prime of the proper gantry help.
The M5C comes with a neat little software equipment that accommodates Allen wrenches, a aspect cutter to clip the filament earlier than feeding it, and several other extra instruments. You will additionally discover a a substitute nozzle, which you’ll in all probability want finally when you do a whole lot of printing. These are all contained in a separate case, a pleasant contact that considerably makes up for the sparse setup and working directions. To complement them, chances are you’ll wish to flip to YouTube, the place you may discover movies to stroll you thru the commonest operations, together with changing the extruder (ought to that show needed). A few of this data can also be out there on the AnkerMake web site help pages, although it might be higher if it had been included in a extra detailed set of directions within the field.

As soon as assembled, the M5C has modules that flank either side of the gantry. Not like the M5, which has a digicam and management panel in the proper module and a filament feed by way of the left, the modules serve no apparent function on the M5C. The standing and all printer controls are accessed by way of the slicer software program and the app, which is obtainable for each iOS and Android units.
The ultimate little bit of setup is to put in the slicer software program. AnkerMake provides its personal software program, which is what I utilized in testing. The corporate additionally states that you would be able to alternatively use UltiMaker Cura or PrusaSlicer when you’d favor. Each of those are only a bit extra complicated, however you may wish to swap to considered one of them as you acquire expertise and wish extra management over the print parameters. AnkerMake’s software program provides each Simple mode, which is the default with the commonest settings, or Knowledgeable mode, which helps you to acquire far more management over parameters reminiscent of layer peak, the extruder settings, retraction velocity, construct plate temperature, and fan motor velocity. For newbie customers, AnkerMake’s slicer is likely to be the only option.
Along with the slicer, you’ll additionally want to put in the AnkerMake app in your cell system, since that’s the solely option to get the printer able to load and unload filament. You have to to arrange the cell app with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, whereas the PC-based slicer software program requires a 2.4GHz Wi-Fi connection to the printer. The cell app makes use of Bluetooth to connect with the printer every time it’s in vary, however switches to Wi-Fi when you transfer it out of Bluetooth vary. Additionally, you will must arrange an account with Anker with the intention to obtain the software program.

As with just about all fused deposition modeling (FDM) printers, the M5C’s mattress must be leveled earlier than you begin printing to make sure that the extruder is positioned on the similar distance from the print mattress no matter the place the filament is being put down. Some printers nonetheless require that you simply carry out this manually utilizing a card or piece of paper to set the Z-axis offset (the space of the extruder from the print mattress) in a number of places across the mattress. The M5C performs this leveling mechanically, and checks the extent at 49 factors (a 7-by-7-point matrix) on the print mattress. This takes a couple of minutes, and it occurs each time the printer is powered on earlier than a print can start.
The Software program: Take a Slice, Make a Slice
The M5C can print from three completely different sources. One is from the iOS/Android app. Utilizing this method, you’re restricted in what you may print to the library of objects AnkerMake has curated for you. You may’t load an .STL or .OBJ file into the cell app, nor are you able to slice an object file. The recordsdata that AnkerMake contains within the library are pre-sliced, so assuming you’re pleased with the file from the library, all you need to do is choose the file and print it.
A second possibility is to print from a USB drive containing a sliced file. You will discover a USB-C port on the proper aspect panel of the printer’s base, and when you pre-slice the mannequin, you may print it from the USB drive by urgent the massive button positioned on the highest panel of the printer within the lower-right nook. This selects the topmost file on the drive and prints it. You can even choose the file on the USB drive that you really want printed from the slicer software program.

Lastly, the final methodology is definitely the one you’ll in all probability use probably the most: utilizing the slicer software program on a PC or Mac. Once more, in case you have any expertise with slicers, you’ll really feel snug with AnkerMake’s, and if it’s your first time utilizing a slicer, you will see AnkerMake’s straightforward to make use of, particularly within the default Simple mode.
We printed a number of dozen items on the M5C, many from the favored website Thingiverse.com, with a couple of extra from Printables.com. Three of the fashions we used are benchmarks that can be utilized to find out print high quality, which we’ll talk about under. In addition they assist dial in the perfect print settings within the slicer software program, which converts a mannequin in .STL or .OBJ format into the directions that the printer wants to really print the mannequin layer by layer.

The default print velocity is 250 millimeters (mm) per second, which is frequent for the entry-level 3D printer class. The M5C (and more moderen M5 fashions) even have the potential of printing at twice that velocity, utilizing a setting within the slicer software program. We printed a lot of fashions on the 500mm-per-second setting, and had been impressed by how far more rapidly the prints had been generated. On shut examination, we noticed only a few layer traces, and a good quantity of stringing, however for a lot of informal prints, the high-speed mode can be fantastic and save appreciable time. It’s additionally helpful if you wish to do a proof print to see what the ultimate print (printed both on the default velocity, or the slower setting of 50mm per second) will seem like.
It’s typically essential to fine-tune the slicer settings to realize the very best quality within the print. As you begin to turn out to be acquainted with the printer and the default settings, you’ll in all probability wish to experiment with settings reminiscent of extruder warmth and retraction. You can even turn out to be acquainted with settings by printing a number of the many fashions out there on-line that present slicer settings for the perfect outcomes.

By experimenting with the completely different velocity settings, you’ll get an concept of how a lot time you’ll save printing on the prime velocity (or conversely, how far more time it can take to print on the slowest velocity, which is meant to supply the perfect print outcomes). The slicer and cell app present the estimated time elapsed for the file that you’re printing, in addition to a countdown to when the print will end.
Testing the AnkerMake M5C: Good High quality Output
For probably the most half, the fashions we chosen printed very properly utilizing the default settings within the slicer for PLA+ filament. We used a number of colours of this filament sort from eSun, which is the filament really helpful for printing and analyzing the Kickstarter-Autodesk mannequin. This mannequin is considered one of two that truly have a rubric to attain numerous elements of the print, reminiscent of dimensional accuracy, filament circulate management, fantastic detrimental options, overhangs, bridging, resonance, and Z-axis alignment.
An ideal rating on this benchmark can be 30 factors. The M5C scored 25.5 factors, which is superb, however only a contact decrease than the M5 managed. The a part of this benchmark that introduced down the rating probably the most was Effective Stream Management, by which the take a look at object scored 2.5 out of a doable 5. This take a look at measures the size of the spikes on the prime of the article in addition to the quantity of stringing between the spires, which was pretty noticeable. Stringing could be very typically brought on by the slicer’s retraction setting, which is how briskly the filament is withdrawn when the extruder is transferring. Too gradual, and the filament continues to be molten when the extruder strikes from one place to a different, inflicting a string.

The second print that has a scoring rationalization is the 3D Benchy. One part of the rating is the horizontal total size. In accordance with the rubric, this a part of the 3D Benchy ought to measure precisely 60mm. The M5 recorded 62.03mm, whereas the M5C did even higher at 60.38mm. Whereas we didn’t carry out measurements on each benchmark the rubric accommodates, we did measure lots of them and located the print to correspond virtually completely to the measurements given within the rubric.
Our third benchmark, a geometrical take a look at mannequin, doesn’t have a proper scoring rubric, however does have options that may be examined to find out print high quality, together with geometric and typographic types that lower in dimension going horizontally from left to proper. I didn’t discover any anomalies aside from some slight seen layering on the hemispheres and a small little bit of bridging in a number of of the hole cylinders. We additionally noticed these in the identical take a look at that was carried out on the M5. On this take a look at, we discovered the M5C’s replica to be very correct.

In the entire prints we generated, just one completely did not print—a mannequin of the Apollo lunar lander. We tried printing this mannequin at completely different dimensions and construct plate and extruder temperatures, and ended up with a tangle of filament on two of the mannequin’s 4 legs on each print. We in all probability might have gotten an honest print by including helps, however our testing was carried out with the slicer’s default settings, which didn’t advocate them.

Along with the three formal benchmarks and the lunar lander, we printed quite a lot of different fashions, together with a determine of Child Yoda and a big owl determine (pictured above). All of those efficiently printed and had been of top quality with no noticeable layering, although we did see a small quantity of stringing on the owl mannequin, as we did on the Kickstarter-Autodesk print.
In all three of the benchmarks, in addition to the opposite objects we printed, the output high quality bordered on glorious. It must be talked about that these outcomes had been obtained with the identical eSun PLA+ filament utilized in all three benchmarks. The precise print outcomes are going to be affected by the model and spool of the filaments used to supply the print. All the measurement comparisons had been carried out on the typical of the outcomes of three iterations of prints.
Verdict: An Glorious Midrange 3D Printer
We’re impressed with AnkerMake’s first-generation M5 printer, and the M5C builds upon a lot of the identical know-how whereas coming in at a cheaper price. As you’d anticipate, it additionally eliminates some options, such because the real-time and time-lapse digicam, and the AI perform that alerts you to an issue reminiscent of a misalignment of a layer. However Anker has saved the guts of the M5, in that the M5C is simple to assemble and to make use of. The prints we produced had been of top quality, even with the default settings within the slicer software program, and being able to manage the printer from a cell system is a pleasant contact. We additionally favored the supply of the quick 500mm-per-second mode, although for probably the most half, entry-level customers who print solely often might not discover this a compelling function.
Then again, the M5C’s documentation may very well be lot higher, particularly in areas {that a} starting consumer would want, reminiscent of methods to pause and resume if you might want to change a filament shade or expertise a filament run-out in the midst of a print.
Total, whereas an entry-level consumer can discover many 3D printers that price lower than the $400 M5C, given its ease of meeting and use, we nonetheless assume it’s a wonderful worth.